Epidemiology and Comorbidities of Vestibular Disorders: Preliminary Findings of the AVOCADO Study.

INTRODUCTION: Studies on incidence and prevalence of vestibular disorders tend to focus on small pockets of patients recruited from specialized clinics and often exclude measures of vestibular function. The objectives of the study were to characterize patients with common vestibular disorders, estimate the prevalence of common vestibular disorders, and ascertain whether patients with vestibular disorders experience increased risks of falls and morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes both inpatient and outpatient routine clinical care data culled from a nationally representative, population-based sample. Patients were included if their record in the TriNetX Diamond Cohort comprised at least one vestibular function test or vestibular diagnosis. The main outcome measures were diagnosis with a vestibular disorder, a fall, or a common medical comorbidity (e.g., diabetes, cerebrovascular disease). RESULTS: The cohort includes n = 4,575,724 patients, of which 55% (n = 2,497,136) had a minimum of one vestibular diagnosis. Patients with vestibular diagnoses were 61.3 ± 16.6 years old (mean ± standard deviation), 67% women, 28% White race (69% unknown race), and 30% of non-Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (66% unknown ethnicity). The prevalence of vestibular disorders was estimated at 2.98% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.98-2.98%). Patients with vestibular diagnoses experienced a significantly greater odds of falls (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05), cerebrovascular disease (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.40-1.43), ischemic heart disease (OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.16-1.19), and diabetes (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.13-1.15), among others. DISCUSSION: Vestibular disorders affect an estimated 3% of the U.S. population, after weighting. Patients with these disorders are at greater risk for many common, consequential medical conditions.

Development of a ground-based sensorimotor disorientation analog to replicate astronaut postflight experience.

The perceptual and motor coordination problems experienced following return from spaceflight reflect the sensory adaptation to altered gravity. The purpose of this study was to develop a ground-based analog that replicates similar sensorimotor impairment using a standard measures test battery and subjective feedback from experienced crewmembers. This Sensorimotor Disorientation Analog (SDA) included varying levels of sensorimotor disorientation through combined vestibular, visual, and proprioceptive disruptions. The SDA was evaluated on five previously flown astronauts to compare with their postflight experience and functional motor performance immediately (Return (R)+0 days) and +24 h (R+1) after landing. The SDA consisted of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), visual disruption goggles, and a weighted suit to alter proprioceptive feedback and replicate perceived heaviness postflight. Astronauts reported that GVS alone replicated ∼50-90% of their postflight performance with the weighted suit fine-tuning the experience to replicate an additional 10%-40% of their experience. Astronauts did not report feeling that the disruption goggles represented either the visual disruptions or illusory sensations that they experienced, nor did they impact motor performance in postflight tasks similarly. Based on these results, we recommend an SDA including the GVS and the weighted suit. These results provide a more realistic and portable SDA framework to provide transient spaceflight-relevant sensorimotor disruptions for use in countermeasure testing and as a pre-flight training tool.

Visual vertigo and motion sickness is different between persistent postural-perceptual dizziness and vestibular migraine.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) and vestibular migraine (VM) share symptoms of visual vertigo and motion sickness that can be confusing for clinicians to distinguish. We compare the severity of these symptoms and dynamic subjective visual vertical (dSVV) in these two common vestibular conditions. METHOD: Twenty-nine patients with PPPD, 37 with VM, and 29 controls were surveyed for subjective symptoms using the visual vertigo analogue scale (VVAS) and motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire during childhood (MSA) and the past 10 years (MSB). dSVV is a measure of visual dependence measures perception of verticality against a rotating background (5 deg./s). RESULTS: VVAS revealed contextual differences for dizziness between those with PPPD and VM. Ratings of visual vertigo were most severe in PPPD, less in VM, and mild in controls (VVAS PPPD 27.1, VM 11.2, control 4.6, p < 0.001). MSA was more severe in VM than in PPPD or control (12.8 vs 7.6 vs 8.5, p = 0.01). MSB was more severe in VM than controls (MSB score 12.9 VS 8.1 p = 0.009) but was not different than PPPD (MSB score 10.0, p = 0.10). dSVV alignment was similar among the three groups (p = 0.83). Both VM and PPPD groups had greater simulator sickness than controls after completing the dSVV. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PPPD report more visual vertigo than those with VM, but a history of motion sickness as a child is more common in VM. Additionally, the environmental context that induces visual vertigo is different between PPPD and VM.

Case Report: Keep your eyes open! Nystagmus guides atypical BPPV.

The clinical diagnosis of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is confirmed from observing the direction, intensity, and duration of nystagmus from unique head positions that advantage gravity to overcome the inertia of otoconia displaced inside the semicircular canals. This case series highlights BPPV with atypical nystagmus presentations relative to the head position. Clinicians should carefully observe symptoms and nystagmus presentations regardless of the testing position and utilize technology and rules of vestibular physiology to enhance their diagnostic acumen.

Effect of vestibular loss on head-on-trunk stability in individuals with vestibular schwannoma.

The vestibulo-collic reflex generates neck motor commands to produce head-on-trunk movements that are essential for stabilizing the head relative to space. Here we examined the effects of vestibular loss on head-on-trunk kinematics during voluntary behavior. Head and trunk movements were measured in individuals with vestibular schwannoma before and then 6 weeks after unilateral vestibular deafferentation via surgical resection of the tumor. Movements were recorded in 6 dimensions (i.e., 3 axes of rotation and 3 axes of translation) using small light-weight inertial measurement units while participants performed balance and gait tasks. Kinematic measures differed between individuals with vestibular schwannoma (at both time points) and healthy controls for the more challenging exercises, namely those performed in tandem position or on an unstable surface without visual input. Quantitative assessment of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) revealed a reduction in VOR gain for individuals with vestibular schwannoma compared to control subjects, that was further reduced following surgery. These findings indicated that the impairment caused by either the tumor or subsequent surgical tumor resection altered head-on-trunk kinematics in a manner that is not normalized by central compensation. In contrast, we further found that head-on-trunk kinematics in individuals with vestibular schwannoma were actually comparable before and after surgery. Thus, taken together, our results indicate that vestibular loss impacts head-on-trunk kinematics during voluntary balance and gait behaviors, and suggest that the neural mechanisms mediating adaptation alter the motion strategies even before surgery in a manner that may be maladaptive for long-term compensation.

Risk of Cervical Dizziness in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis.

Importance: The dizziness associated with cervical spondylosis is a controversial topic given that many experts believe that cervical spondylosis is a common cause of dizziness, whereas others do not believe it exists. Objective: To compare the risk of dizziness between patients with cervical spondylosis and matched controls (ie, patients with lumbar spondylosis after propensity score matching [PSM]). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used medical claims data from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan for patients 60 years or older with cervical or lumbar spondylosis newly diagnosed in any outpatient department between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015. Patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis were included as the study cohort, and those diagnosed with lumbar spondylosis who were matched to the study cohort via PSM were selected as the control cohort. Both cohorts were followed up for 1 year unless they were diagnosed with dizziness, censored by death, or withdrew from the health insurance program. Data analysis was performed from August 9 to September 20, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the date of outpatient diagnosis of dizziness. The risks of dizziness were compared between groups. The relative risk and incidence rate difference were calculated. Results: A total of 3638 patients with cervical spondylosis (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [7.1] years; 2024 [55.6%] male) and 3638 patients with lumbar spondylosis (mean [SD] age, 68.0 [7.1] years; 2024 [55.6%] male) after PSM were selected as the study and control cohorts, respectively. The patients with cervical spondylosis had higher risk of dizziness than matched controls, with a 1-year relative risk of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.03-1.39). The 1-year incidence of dizziness was 10.2% (95% CI, 9.2%-11.2%) in patients with cervical spondylosis and 8.6% (95% CI, 7.7%-9.5%) in the matched group of lumbar spondylosis. The incidence rate difference between the groups was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.3%-3.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: These data support the association between dizziness and cervical spondylosis, but the small difference between groups reveals that dizziness associated with cervical spondylosis is uncommon. Clinicians should be wary of diagnosing a cervical cause for dizziness based on an actual history of cervical spondylosis.

Head movement kinematics are differentially altered for extended versus short duration gait exercises in individuals with vestibular loss.

Head kinematics are altered in individuals with vestibular schwannoma (VS) during short duration gait tasks [i.e., Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)], both before and after surgery, yet whether these differences extend to longer duration gait exercises is currently unknown. Here we examined the effects of vestibular loss and subsequent compensation on head kinematics in individuals with VS during gait exercises of relatively extended versus short duration (< 10 versus 30 s), compared to age-matched controls. Six-dimensional head movements were recorded during extended and short duration gait exercises before and then 6 weeks after sectioning of the involved vestibular nerve (vestibular neurectomy). Standard functional, physiological, and subjective clinical assessments were also performed at each time point. Kinematics were differentially altered in individuals with vestibular loss at both time points during extended versus short duration exercises. Range of motion was significantly reduced in extended tasks. In contrast, movement variability predominately differed for the short duration exercises. Overall, our results indicate that quantifying head kinematics during longer duration gait tasks can provide novel information about how VS individuals compensate for vestibular loss, and suggest that measurements of range of motion versus variability can provide information regarding the different strategies deployed to maintain functional locomotion.

Resolution of atypical posterior semicircular canal BPPV: evidence for putative short-arm location.

This case demonstrates the successful identification and treatment of atypical posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) based on a unique presentation of positional nystagmus, the resultant nystagmus from repositioning manoeuvers, and restored function of the affected semicircular canal. This case illustrates the importance of completing a comprehensive clinical examination and the value for incorporating the video head impulse test as well as adjusting treatment based on testing and patient response when managing variant cases of BPPV.

Video Ocular Counter-Roll (vOCR): Otolith-Ocular Function and Compensatory Effect of the Neck Following Vestibular Loss.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of recovery following vestibular loss has been limited by the lack of bedside measures in clinical settings. Here, we used the video ocular counter-roll (vOCR) test to study otolith-ocular function and compensatory effect of neck proprioception in patients at different stages of vestibular loss. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. METHODS: Fifty-six subjects were recruited including patients with acute (9 ± 2 days [mean ± standard error of mean]), subacute (61 ± 11 days), and chronic (1009 ± 266 days) unilateral loss of vestibular function, as well as a group of healthy controls. We used a video-oculography method based on tracking the iris for vOCR measurement. To examine the effect of neck inputs, vOCR was recorded during two simple tilt maneuvers in all subjects while seated: 30° head-on-body tilt and 30° head-and-body tilt. RESULTS: The vOCR responses evolved at different stages following vestibular loss with improvement of the gains in the chronic stage. The deficit was more pronounced when the whole body was tilted (acute: 0.08 ± 0.01, subacute: 0.11 ± 0.01, chronic: 0.13 ± 0.02, healthy control: 0.18 ± 0.01), and the gain of vOCR improved when the head was tilted on the body (acute: 0.11 ± 0.01, subacute: 0.14 ± 0.01, chronic: 0.13 ± 0.02, healthy control: 0.17 ± 0.01). The time course of vOCR response was affected as well with reduced amplitude and slower response in the acute stage of vestibular loss. CONCLUSION: The vOCR test can be valuable as a clinical marker to measure vestibular recovery and compensatory effect of neck proprioception in patients at different stages following loss of vestibular function.

The minimal clinically important difference for gait speed in significant unilateral vestibular hypofunction after vestibular rehabilitation.

Gait speed is a valid measure of both physical function and vestibular health. Vestibular rehabilitation is useful to improve gait speed for patients with vestibular hypofunction, yet there is little data to indicate how changes in gait speed reflect changes in patient-reported health outcomes. We determined the minimal clinically important difference in the gait speed of patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction, mostly due to deafferentation surgery, as anchored to the Dizziness Handicap Index and the Activities Balance Confidence scale, validated using regression analysis, change difference, receiver-operator characteristic curve, and average change methods. After six weeks of vestibular rehabilitation, a change in gait speed from 0.20 to 0.34 m/s with 95% confidence was required for the patients to perceive a significant reduction in perception of dizziness and improved balance confidence.

Comparison of Asymmetry between Perceptual, Ocular, and Postural Vestibular Screening Tests.

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of how vestibular asymmetry manifests across tests is important due to its potential implications for balance dysfunction, motion sickness susceptibility, and adaptation to new environments. OBJECTIVE: We report the results of multiple tests for vestibular asymmetry in 32 healthy participants. METHODS: Asymmetry was measured using perceptual reports during unilateral centrifugation, oculomotor responses during visual alignment tasks, vestibulo-ocular reflex gain during head impulse tests, and body rotation during stepping tests. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between asymmetries of subjective visual vertical and verbal report during unilateral centrifugation. Another significant correlation was observed between the asymmetries of ocular alignment, vestibulo-ocular reflex gain, and body rotation. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there are underlying vestibular asymmetries in healthy individuals that are consistent across various vestibular challenges. In addition, these findings have value in guiding test selection during experimental design for assessing vestibular asymmetry in healthy adults.

When, where, and why should we look for vestibular dysfunction in people with diabetes mellitus?

The biochemistry of diabetes mellitus results in multi-system tissue compromise that reduces functional mobility and interferes with disease management. Sensory system compromise, such as peripheral neuropathy and retinopathy, are specific examples of tissue compromise detrimental to functional mobility. There is lack of clarity regarding if, when, and where parallel changes in the peripheral vestibular system, an additional essential sensory system for functional mobility, occur as a result of diabetes. Given the systemic nature of diabetes and the plasticity of the vestibular system, there is even less clarity regarding if potential vestibular system changes impact functional mobility in a meaningful fashion. This commentary will provide insight as to when we should employ diagnostic vestibular function tests in people with diabetes, where in the periphery we should look, and why testing may or may not matter. The commentary concludes with recommendations for future research and clinical care.

Head movement kinematics are altered during balance stability exercises in individuals with vestibular schwannoma.

BACKGROUND: Balance stabilization exercises are often prescribed to facilitate compensation in individuals with vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, both the assessment and prescription of these exercises are reliant on clinical observations and expert opinion rather than on quantitative evidence. The aim of this study was to quantify head motion kinematics in individuals with vestibular loss while they performed commonly prescribed balance stability exercises. METHODS: Using inertial measurement units, head movements of individuals with vestibular schwannoma were measured before and after surgical deafferentation and compared with age-matched controls. RESULTS: We found that individuals with vestibular schwannoma experienced more variable head motion compared to healthy controls both pre- and postoperatively, particularly in absence of visual input, but that there was little difference between preoperative and postoperative kinematic measurements for our vestibular schwannoma group. We further found correlations between head motion kinematic measures during balance exercises, performed in the absence of visual input, and multiple clinical measurements for preoperative VS subjects. Subjects with higher head motion variability also had worse DVA scores, moved more slowly during the Timed up and Go and gait speed tests, and had lower scores on the functional gait assessment. In contrast, we did not find strong correlations between clinical measures and postoperative head kinematics for the same VS subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that further development of such metrics based on the quantification of head motion has merit for the assessment and prescription of balance exercises, as demonstrated by the calculation of a "kinematic score" for identifying the most informative balance exercise (i.e., "Standing on foam eyes closed").

Greater Disability Is Associated with Worse Vestibular and Compensatory Oculomotor Functions in People Living with Multiple Sclerosis.

Globally, there are nearly three million people living with multiple sclerosis (PLW-MS). Many PLW-MS experience vertigo and have signs of vestibular dysfunction, e.g., low vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains or the presence of compensatory saccades (CSs), on video head impulse testing (vHIT). We examined whether the vestibular function and compensatory oculomotor behaviors in PLW-MS differed based on the level of MS-related disability. The VOR gain, CS frequency and latency, and gaze position error (GPE) were calculated from the individual traces obtained during six-canal vHIT for 37 PLW-MS (mean age 53.4 ± 12.4 years-old, 28 females) with vertigo and/or an imbalance. The subjects were grouped by their Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores: PLW-min-MS (EDSS = 1.0-2.5, n = 8), PLW-mild-MS (EDSS = 3.0-4.5, n = 23), and PLW-moderate-MS (EDSS = 5.0-6.0, n = 6). The between-group differences were assessed with Kruskal-Wallis tests. The VOR gains for most of the canals were higher for PLW-min-MS compared to PLW-mild- and mod-MS, respectively. CS occurred less often in PLW-min-MS versus PLW-mild- and mod-MS, respectively. No clear trend in CS latency was found. The GPE was often lower for PLW-min-MS compared to PLW-mild- and mod-MS, respectively. Thus, our data demonstrate that worse VOR and compensatory oculomotor functions are associated with a greater MS-related disability. PLW-MS may benefit from personalized vestibular physical therapy.

Unidirectional Vertical Vestibuloocular Reflex Adaptation in Humans Using 1D and 2D Scenes.

HYPOTHESIS: The vertical vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in response to pitch head impulses can be optimally trained to increase in one direction using a two-dimensional (2D) visual training target with minimal effect on the horizontal VOR. BACKGROUND: We modified the incremental VOR adaptation (IVA) technique, shown to increase the horizontal VOR in patients with vestibular hypofunction, to drive vertical VOR adaptation in healthy control subjects. METHODS: We measured the horizontal and vertical active (self-generated) and passive (imposed) head impulse VOR gains (eye velocity/head velocity) before and after 15 minutes of unidirectional downward IVA training. IVA training consisted of two sessions, one using a single-dot one-dimensional (1D) target, the other a grid-of-dots 2D target. RESULTS: The downward head impulse VOR gain significantly increased because of training by 13.3%, whereas the upward VOR gain did not change. The addition of extraretinal (2D) feedback did not result in greater adaptation, i.e., 1D and 2D gain increases were 15.5% and 10.6%, respectively. The vertical VOR gain increase resulted in a 3.2% decrease in horizontal VOR gain. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study is the first to show that physiologically relevant (high frequency) unidirectional increases in vertical VOR gain are possible with just 15 minutes of training. This study sets the basis for future clinical trials examining vertical IVA training in patients, which may provide the first practical rehabilitation treatment to functionally improve the vertical VOR.

Rehabilitation to Improve Gaze and Postural Stability in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) frequently experience dizziness and imbalance that may be caused by central vestibular system dysfunction. Vestibular rehabilitation may offer an approach for improving dysfunction in these people. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a gaze and postural stability (GPS) retraining intervention compared to a strength and endurance (SAE) intervention in PwMS. METHODS: About 41 PwMS, with complaints of dizziness or history of falls, were randomized to either the GPS or SAE groups. Following randomization participants completed 6-weeks of 3×/week progressive training, delivered one-on-one by a provider. Following intervention, testing was performed at the primary (6-weeks) and secondary time point (10-weeks). A restricted maximum likelihood estimation mixed effects model was used to examine changes in the primary outcome of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) between the 2 groups at the primary and secondary time point. Similar models were used to explore secondary outcomes between groups at both timepoints. RESULTS: Thirty-five people completed the study (17 GPS; 18 SAE). The change in the DHI at the primary time point was not statistically different between the GPS and SAE groups (mean difference = 2.33 [95% CI -9.18, 12.85]). However, both groups demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to 6-weeks (GPS -8.73; SAE -7.31). Similar results were observed for secondary outcomes and at the secondary timepoint. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of PwMS with complaints of dizziness or imbalance, 6-weeks of GPS training did not result in significantly greater improvements in dizziness handicap or balance compared to 6-weeks of SAE training.

Unique compensatory oculomotor behavior in people living with multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Globally, there are 3 million people living with multiple sclerosis (PLW-MS). A large proportion of PLW-MS have abnormal vestibular function tests that suggest central vestibular lesions. Yet, data regarding vestibular-ocular control in PLW-MS is limited. Thus, we aimed to further characterize compensatory saccade (CS) behavior in PLW-MS. METHODS: We analyzed video head impulse data from four groups of six age- and sex-matched adults: people living with mild MS (PLW-mild-MS, people living with moderate MS (PLW-moderate-MS), people living with unilateral vestibular deafferentation (PLW-UVD), and healthy controls (HC). RESULTS: PLW-moderate-MS had lower lateral canal vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain bilaterally compared to PLW-mild MS (p < 0.001), HC (p < 0.001), and PLW-UVD (p < 0.001). CS frequency was higher for impulses towards the less affected side in PLW-moderate-MS versus the more (p = 0.01) and less (p < 0.001) affected sides in PLW-mild-MS. CS latency was shorter (p < 0.001) and CS peak velocity was lower (p < 0.001) with impulses towards the more affected side versus the less affected side in PLW-moderate-MS. However, CS peak velocity with impulses towards each side was similar in PLW-mild-MS (p = 0.12). Gaze position error (GPE) was larger after impulses towards the more affected side versus the less affected side in PLW-moderate-MS (p < 0.001) and PLW-mild-MS (p < 0.001). MS-related disability was moderately associated with VOR gain (p < 0.001) and GPE (p < 0.001). Additionally, we identified micro-saccades and position correcting saccades that were uniquely employed by PLW-MS as compensatory gaze stabilizing strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In PLW-MS, the characteristics of compensatory oculomotor behavior depend on the extent of residual VOR gain.

Compensatory saccades differ between those with vestibular hypofunction and multiple sclerosis pointing to unique roles for peripheral and central vestibular inputs.

Individuals with peripheral or central vestibular dysfunction recruit compensatory saccades (CSs) in response to high acceleration, yaw head impulses. Although CSs have been shown to be an effective strategy for reducing gaze position error (GPE) in individuals with peripheral hypofunction, for individuals with central vestibular dysfunction, the effectiveness of CS is unknown. The purpose of our study was to compare the effectiveness of CS, defined as the ability to compensate for head velocity and eye position errors, between persons with central and peripheral vestibular dysfunction. We compared oculomotor responses during video head impulse testing between individuals with unilateral peripheral vestibular deafferentation, a disorder of the peripheral vestibular afferents, and individuals with multiple sclerosis, a condition affecting the central vestibular pathways. We hypothesized that relative to individuals with peripheral lesions, individuals with central dysfunction would recruit CSs that were delayed and inappropriately scaled to head velocity and GPE. We show that CSs recruited by persons with central vestibular pathology were not uniformly deficient but instead were of a sufficient velocity to compensate for reductions in VOR gain. Compared to those with peripheral vestibular lesions, individuals with central pathology also recruited earlier covert CS with amplitudes that were better corrected for GPE. Conversely, those with central lesions showed greater variability in the amplitude of overt CS relative to GPE. These data point to a unique role for peripheral and central vestibular inputs in the recruitment of CS and suggest that covert CSs are an effective oculomotor strategy for individuals with multiple sclerosis.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Compensatory saccades (CSs) are recruited by individuals with unilateral vestibular deafferentation (UVD) to compensate for an impaired vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). The effectiveness of CS in multiple sclerosis (MS), a central vestibular impairment, is unknown. We show that in UVD and in MS, covert CSs compensate for reduced VOR gain and minimize gaze position error (GPE), yet in >50% of individuals with MS, overt CS worsened GPE, suggesting unique roles for peripheral and central vestibular inputs.

Regional differences in patient-reported outcomes as a proxy of healthcare practices for Americans living with vestibular symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Geographical location is known to affect health outcomes; however, evidence regarding whether location affects healthcare for persons suspected to have vestibular dysfunction is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether location affects healthcare seeking and outcomes for adults with symptoms of vestibular pathology. METHODS: We assessed for regional disparities associated with demographics, diagnosis, chronological factors, and financial expenditures from Americans who participated in the Vestibular Disorders Association registry (N = 905, 57.4±12.5 years, 82.7% female, 94.8% White, and 8.1% Hispanic or Latino). Respondents were grouped per geographical regions defined by the United States Census Bureau. RESULTS: There were no significant between-region differences for age (p = 0.10), sex (p = 0.78), or ethnicity (p = 0.24). There were more Asian respondents in the West versus the Midwest (p = 0.05) and more Black respondents in the South versus the West (p = 0.05). The time to first seek care was shorter in the Northeast (17.3 [SD = 49.5] weeks) versus the South (42.4 [SD = 83.7] weeks), p = 0.015. The time from the first healthcare visit to receiving a final diagnosis was shorter in the Northeast (46.5 [SD = 75.4] weeks) versus the South (68.9 [SD = 89.7] weeks), p = 0.015. Compared to the Midwest, fewer respondents in the Northeast reported "no" out-of-pocket financial impact, p = 0.039. CONCLUSIONS: Geographical location affects healthcare seeking and outcomes for persons suspected to have vestibular dysfunction.

Patients' Experiences with Management of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: Insights from the Vestibular Disorders Association Registry.

Introduction: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most frequently occurring peripheral vestibular disorder. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for BPPV exist; however, little is known about how affected patients perceive their condition is being managed. We aimed to leverage registry data to evaluate how adults who report BPPV are managed. Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed of data from 1,262 adults (58.4 ± 12.6 years old, 81.1% female, 91.1% White) who were enrolled in the Vestibular Disorders Association Registry from 2014 to 2020. The following patient-reported outcomes were analyzed by proportions for those who did and did not report BPPV: symptoms experienced, falls reported, diagnostics undertaken, interventions received (eg, canalith repositioning maneuvers [CRMs], medications), and responses to interventions. Results: Of the 1,262 adults included, 26% reported being diagnosed with BPPV. Many adults who reported BPPV (83%) also endorsed receiving additional vestibular diagnoses or may have had atypical BPPV. Those with BPPV underwent magnetic resonance imaging and were prescribed medications more frequently than those without BPPV (76% vs 57% [χ2=36.51, p<0.001] and 85% vs 78% [χ2=5.60, p=0.018], respectively). Falls were experienced by similar proportions of adults with and without BPPV (55% vs 56% [χ2==11.26, p=0.59]). Adults with BPPV received CRMs more often than those without BPPV (86% vs 48%, χ2=127.23, p<0.001). More registrants with BPPV also endorsed benefit from CRMs compared to those without BPPV (51% vs 12% [χ2=105.30, p<0.001]). Discussion: In this registry, BPPV was often reported with other vestibular disorders. Healthcare utilization was higher than would be expected with care based on the CPG. The rates of falls in those with and without BPPV are higher than previously reported. Adults with BPPV reported significant differences in how their care is managed and their overall outcomes compared to those without BPPV. Conclusion: Patient-reported outcomes provide useful information regarding the lived experience of adults with BPPV.